World Cup prize money disparity is an obstacle to Equal Pay Day
Written by
Share
Written by
It was a game, you know, a test of character, of courage and of character: the most important game in the history of the world. It was a game, you know, a test of character, of courage and of character: the most important game in the history of the world. It was a game, you know, a test of character, of courage and of character: the most important game in the history of the world.
This was not a game for Americans to dominate. This was not a game for Americans to dominate. This was a game for the world, and the greatest international sporting tournament in history.
The US team was dominant, too. But we, the world, failed to show up – a team composed mostly of players from other countries. We, the world, failed to show up – a team composed mostly of players from other countries. We showed up by failing to use our talent, by failing to show up on the biggest stage in sports, and by failing to show up at all – a team of non-Americans: the world.
We showed up by failing to use our talent, by failing to show up on the biggest stage in sports, and by failing to show up at all – a team of non-Americans: the world. The USA won its first World Cup, but the US women didn’t win the prize money. It goes without saying that, over the course of the tournament, they earned over $30 million dollars.
The USA also didn’t win its first World Cup, but the US men didn’t have anywhere near the team of the USA women – or the USA women: in the World Cup, the US men have just one of the top two spots in the ranking of the best national teams in the world.
They didn’t win their first World Cup, but the US men had over $60 million dollars of prize money. The
